Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | itintheory's commentslogin

How does the bot farm profit? Did I miss it in the article somehow?

This is the bread and butter for commercial VPN services. The VPN knows who you are (maybe, unless you pay crypto/cash), and the rights-holders know your VPN address (from joining/logging a BitTorrent swarm, for instance), but the better providers keep no logs, and I'm guessing there's too many individuals to target effectively.

I've received a nasty letter from the ISP over BitTorrent (someone's phone joined my wifi, torrenting without my knowledge), but using a VPN seems sufficient. I think the Hetzener suggestion is a VPS for running the software stack. You could alternatively self host on hardware in your home.


Yeah, I really have no idea what's going on here. Maybe I too could burn some tokens to have claude explain it to me, but I won't.

It's pretty cheap to run a fight re token cost depending on model. I think Opus is $0.15 for a brawl. It comes down to your budget for agent leisure activities. You do get a cool rendering as a gift for your fight.

There's a lot of room for improvement. Thinking about adding clawtokens to join a fight. Winner takes the pot.


Could you share examples?

Don't know what sport AlpacaJones is talking about but I can think of Gaelic Football and Hurling. Two sports that are very popular in Ireland (whose population is smaller than many major cities) but barely known anywhere else in the world. The total number of fans is way too small to justify a typical video game budget, but if you made a really good game based on either sport, it would probably sell well in Ireland.

https://www.gaelicstar.com/

To be clear, not my game. But as a GAA fan it's as good as any GAA game any studio released.


Sure, but this "invention" isn't new. It seems to make the internet rounds every few months. Here's one from 11 years ago that looks almost identical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPVQMZ4ikvM - I wonder how their "preliminary patent application" went...


Whose cause? I think the government already has our IDs, given that they issued them.

The government isn't typically facilitating the check. In order to verify your age, you will be required to hand over your ID to a third party, who's privacy and security practices are likely: "Trust me bro."

Seeing as how these companies get hacked all the time, (https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/09/fbi-probes-service-selli...) , I don't think it's unreasonable to resist this.

Furthermore, I think many folks have reservations about requiring an ID checkpoint to utilize a computer. Obviously it's not that bad yet, but I don't think it's hyperbolic to state that the landscape is certainly trending in that direction, and it's absolutely not unreasonable to point out that governments and institutions to have a material interest in setting up access controls on who can and can't use the internet (read: participate in society).


Right, I'm not a fan of the ID check or identity/age verification. I'm just trying to understand the conspiracy theory kind of idea that "they're trying to get all our IDs!!!1!!" sentiment.

"The government already has our IDs" is missing the correlation between the ID and the service. They know your face and your name but not what you do on the internet. The website knows what you do on the internet but it isn't tied to your name. It's the tying them together which is the problem.

Which is why the people trying to do it always pull out the misdirect about ZK proofs. Those don't fix anything because a system that actually preserved privacy wouldn't be able to prove that the user is over 18, only that someone is over 18, not necessarily them. And that in turn means you're setting up a rug pull. You roll out a system which is indistinguishable from the perspective of ordinary people from the one that screws them, and then that system can't actually exclude minors so what follows is calls to change it to stop protecting privacy, at which point the people trying to collect everyone's ID will be arguing that you already have to show ID.

It also presumes you would even get a privacy-preserving implementation to begin with, which a pretty credulous assumption given how these things usually go.


It's not possible to prove the user is anything ever. It probably never will be. Likely what will happen instead is that the person in the ID will become personally liable for accounts verified with that ID. Which is even more reason to reject ID verification.

> Likely what will happen instead is that the person in the ID will become personally liable for accounts verified with that ID.

Exactly. Which in turn requires you to have some way of tying those accounts to that ID, which was supposed to be the thing to be prevented.


Governments don't necessarily have the connection between your ID and what you do online, though, and some governments are known to massively buy publicly available data from data brokers to circumvent existing laws. By "some governments" I mean the US government, by the way. That's not a conspiracy either, it's well-documented.

We have a local thrift store that sorts and stores the cables very nicely. 95% of the time I can find exactly what I need right away.

That doesn't mean I don't also have my big box of cables, but just offering an alternate strategy.


good for them. essential infrastructure. pillars of a civil society.

Am I missing something? I get black text on a yellow background, and no apparent toggle...

It isn't as obvious as it used to be, no longer looking like a switch. Click the sunlight icon in the top right. Also, it doesn't work well on mobile.

Not sure if this counts as 'modern', but I had the unfortunate experience of driving near Seneca Meadows[1] recently. I can't begin to describe the visceral level of horrendous stench that is perpetually downwind of this facility.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seneca_Meadows_Landfill


Here's a video of it in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41b8fw3_wP8

An 8.5 min video where the "action" starts after 7 minutes in.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: