I think there's a lot to like about this approach, especially persisting my intent.

I think it will be interesting to see how this plays out when it comes time to debug.

At that time, someone else may be reading my pseudo code and implicitly assuming that the code was translated correctly. If the code wasn't translated correctly, wouldn't the human who naturally assumes it was miss the bug every time?

Huzzah would benefit from having a guard identify pseudo code with two potential interpretations and ask the human to clarify so the reliability of the interpretation does not suffer.

Yep one of the things a real version would need (this is just a proof of concept) is a kind of safeguarding and error handling. You could easily write code that the LLM couldn't feasibly implement, and it would need some way to mitigate that with you.

:) I'm so curious what the prompt was to get this generation.

https://excel1040.com is humming along quite nicely.

Although he calls it "Excel1040.com," the URL I use is:

     https://sites.google.com/view/incometaxspreadsheet/home

I use it every year.

What is it? Site isn’t loading for me

Can't even load!

In 2015, I had a similar curiosity. Coffee stack exchange was just getting started and the top answer is enlightening. https://coffee.stackexchange.com/questions/1749/brewing-with...

The United States leads the developed world in deaths due to this fucking virus. The gbdeclaration will help us continue to lead the world in deaths from the virus.

I'm sorry things are tough.

Belgium leads on a per capita basis which would seem more relevant.

Hopefully you did not set up ACH to withdraw money from your real account.