By this logic, any breach of contract involving a polluting activity is justified.
This is a dispute between a man who flies on climate-change-causing aircraft and the company that operates those airlines. So one could argue that by opening up his previously-paid-for seats to new paying customers, the airline becomes more profitable and contributes more to climate change.
This is a dispute between a man who flies on climate-change-causing aircraft and the company that operates those airlines. So one could argue that by opening up his previously-paid-for seats to new paying customers, the airline becomes more profitable and contributes more to climate change.