Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> it could be nothing.

Well... no, it won't be nothing - it will be something. And I'm all ears for a plausible explanation, so fire away.

All we do know is that in other situations, agents did use it to communicate. So that's not a grand narrative, right? It's already been seen behavior.

So what do you think explains it, besides the already seen and verified explanation?

 help



My specific contention is on trying to ascribe intention on what looks like gibberish.

> Well... no, it won't be nothing - it will be something. And I'm all ears for a plausible explanation, so fire away.

I'm just stating the null hypothesis that it's nothing. Especially since the agents were talking in clear english before and exchanging ideas


So you think there is no reason they did it?

I have never seen an agent perform an action repeatedly/persistently for no reason. Have you?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: