Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Right because near-impossibility of firing someone, and the magnified principal-agent problems of public sector managers negotiating with psu's don't influence behavior in any way.


My complaints involve their mission, their rules, their equipment, and their techniques. None of which are exacerbated by unionization.


Formal spec vs delivered software - there's a similar case here. In any real world organization, the formal written mission and rules are not exactly the ones that are in operation. Unionization especially public-sector unionization further disconnects employees from the rules and the techniques they are _supposed_ to follow. Now this could go either way, but considering the psychopaths and bums that the TSA hires, and the numerous cases we know of theft, I would say that unionization makes things worse with the rules and techniques.


I've never encountered a situation where I was annoyed at TSA because they didn't follow the "formal spec" properly, and wished they had followed it better. In fact, quite the contrary: I have, very occasionally, had places where the TSA let something slide that they officially shouldn't have, and made my life slightly easier as a result.

I don't know why you have such a hard time believing me on this....




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: